shtola: (pic#16392097)
𝐲'𝐬𝐡𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐚 𝐫𝐡𝐮𝐥 ([personal profile] shtola) wrote in [community profile] citynet2023-07-20 05:59 pm

TEXT ✦ un: scion

[Hey, City network! What are you up to today? Having fun exploring the liminal spaces, reliving past memories, getting locked into vaults — or maybe just fucking around? Because apparently someone's in the mood for the latter.]

what's a girl got to do to get a little attention around here? ;)

[A short time after that initial post, a follow-up appears.]

because i certainly wouldn't mind being asked out for a meal and an evening in good company, myself. by someone worthy of the honor, of course; naturally, i'm a lady of discerning tastes.

[And then, a little bit later still: ]

takers must feel the unquenchable thirst of the pursuit of knowledge and be willing to participate in intellectual debate for bells on end. oh, and graciously accept defeat when i inevitably hand it to them. or don't — i'll best you at it whether you accept it or not. i'm ever so brilliant that way. how's that for sharing?

[OOC: If the content of this post sounds suspiciously unlike Y'shtola, that's because it isn't — Thancred ([personal profile] onlythans) and his sticky fingers have "borrowed" her network device for a short time. Responses will come from both Thancred and Y'shtola or possibly just Y'shtola after she murders Thancred in cold blood for this!]
onlythans: (💔 i don't give a shit)

[personal profile] onlythans 2023-07-23 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
why do i sense that these pointed questions are in fact leading somewhere in particular?
onlythans: (💔 she's mine)

[personal profile] onlythans 2023-07-23 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
no, not at all

i simply don't believe you're capable of it either way
limbical: (i mean i could commission icons)

[personal profile] limbical 2023-07-23 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
And I sense that you and Y'shtola are allergic to answering simple "yes" or "no" questions.

Did you or did you not remove an item? You don't need to tell me what it is.
onlythans: (💔 guys don't like me)

[personal profile] onlythans 2023-07-23 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
now that i would agree with
far be it from me to taint your understanding of your perfect star

it certainly must have been worth it
given the lengths lahabrea was willing to go for its sake

i'll leave you to it then
should you need reach out to me again, i've told you what name you can use
onlythans: (💔 she's mine)

[personal profile] onlythans 2023-07-23 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
a gag would make it rather difficult for him to debate for bells on end, would it not?

though it does raise other intriguing possibilities instead
onlythans: (💔 you can ride it)

[personal profile] onlythans 2023-07-23 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
that's certainly an interesting perspective to take on the matter, "to myself or others". are you always defensive about anything you ever see happening to another person, for fear it might be repeated on yourself? seems rather a stressful way to live a life.

is that why you're interested in my motives? trying to figure out why i targeted who i did?
onlythans: (💔 you can ride it)

[personal profile] onlythans 2023-07-23 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
do be careful when conjuring up any mental images
she shines so bright you may well find yourself blinded by her radiance

what can i say? when i find myself in a garden of flowers, i can hardly help but remark on their beauty
onlythans: (💔 and take me away)

[personal profile] onlythans 2023-07-23 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
oh, hardly
i'm allergic to all questions
she's partial to them but only when she's the one asking them

supposing i did?
limbical: (who knows how to swing)

[personal profile] limbical 2023-07-24 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
You should see a doctor about that. Fortunately, I am one. Do you break out in hives? I wonder if asking that counts.

[Okay, but seriously:]

I would check for a note in the safety deposit box. Something about sharing?
codenametesla: (waiting frown)

[personal profile] codenametesla 2023-07-24 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
[...She doesn't like that he's figured her out as fast as he has, or that he's making her feel like a chronic do-gooder which she is.]

Well, in a world where we've all been dragged out of nowhere to a strange city, we have to look out for each other, right?

And she- you, mentioned knowledge and learning, and I like that, at least, so I would want to try to be friends?

Well... yes. Finding out whether it was malevolent or just someone you were already friends with was something I was curious about. It looked so much like some sort of school prank.
unrequite: (05)

[personal profile] unrequite 2023-07-24 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
That's my point, actually. One cannot convince someone that huge, lavish displays of love and affection exist if that someone in question has difficulty believing in those concepts at all. Someone who is invested in the gift of letting another know they're wanted doesn't ask for proof. They simply risk that level of vulnerability.

That's the first rule, my darling. No one romances someone who is unwilling to be romanced. That's coercion. It's simply not done.
fussiest: (pic#16494211)

[personal profile] fussiest 2023-07-24 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
[ and what colours the drapes should be. by the way, the answer is not black. ]

Which brings me to my main problem with every answer you've posed to this question: that you choose to die on the hill of an unfair dichotomy.
You assume that choosing morality is not practical. That's absurd! Morality is practical because it provides rules that allow us to live with others, and live with ourselves! Morality is practised in our world, therefore it is practical - and choosing a good purpose with no positive moral attributions is far from ideal!
justscribing: (❖ 42)

[personal profile] justscribing 2023-07-24 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
[The one time Alhaitham is willing to take color matching into account and suddenly black doesn't "go with everything" anymore. It blocks more light! The purpose of curtains!]

It isn't an unfair dichotomy to hold charity to a standard that it must have practical results, which is what the wealthy passing their money down is. If it were a moral good to throw mora into an endless chasm then to actually do so would still be a meaningless task. You can't define a good purpose solely on its moral weight, and someone who engages in practical good without the intent of moral attributions has a much greater impact society as a whole.
icanfixer: (21)

[personal profile] icanfixer 2023-07-24 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
NAY, I DID NOT CONSIDER
BUT THERE ARE BETTER WAYS TO GO ABOUT IT THAN A BORROWING SHE DID NOT AGREE NOR CONSENT TO
FOR EXAMPLE, THEE COULD INVITE HER TO A PLACE OF MEETING AND THEN DO SO WITH ANOTHER OF THY CHOICE AND ALLOW THEM TO GET TO KNOW ONE ANOTHER WHILST THEE ATTEND TO OTHER MATTERS


[ ...............

it isn't villainous!!!!!!!!!!! ]
limbical: (great now i have to pick new lyrics)

[personal profile] limbical 2023-07-24 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
You'd be correct. Is there something about it I can help you with? Answer additional questions?

Page 7 of 9