entwinedfate: (08 through the gloom / white skeletons p)
argalia ([personal profile] entwinedfate) wrote in [community profile] citynet2023-11-09 08:24 pm

audio, @Conductor

[ Hello, you all. While no one's blessed with a pretty face today, his soft, soothing voice should be good enough. ]

Forgive me if this is something that's remarkably normal in this unremarkable city we're in...

[ A small beat, as if he's preoccupied with something else; there's the gentle strum of some string instrument in the moment. A harp, maybe, at the university. ]

... But is there a reason we were asked about our satisfaction in regards to the party they threw last month? Along with that odd question in the second half -- how many of you voted to turn towards the voice, I wonder.

[ You know. This satisfaction survey, that popped up on everyone's devices the first of the month. More soothing harp music, it sounds like he's trying to pick out a tune from memory. ]

I admit, I'm a little curious about everyone's answers! I gave it a pretty neutral score myself; it was novel, but I wouldn't go again. The string of letters and numbers they had in reference to it was rather interesting too, though I'm not certain how it was "for the good of the many". Have there been any others? I recall a similar phrase the day their party was to begin too, actually.
wordchain: (08)

text; un: yesod

[personal profile] wordchain 2023-11-10 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, that was not the first instance. Here are a few previous examples:

CE-50-185.43: Water Under the Bridge
CE-47-185.43

CE-50-361.74: The Good of the Many
CE-47-361.74
wordchain: (01)

text > audio

[personal profile] wordchain 2023-11-13 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
[ There is no harm in continuing this conversation, nor in switching to audio from text, since he only chose the latter to have the alphanumeric strings typed out instead of read aloud one by one, and so he does just that. ]

I would imagine that they represent a specific classification system, as you have concluded. Presumably "50" and "47" denote different groups of test subjects exposed to separate iterations of otherwise identical experiment scenarios.

I'd certainly like to confirm the exact meaning of the remaining numbers as well.
limbical: (great now i have to pick new lyrics)

private; audio; un: loveless

[personal profile] limbical 2023-11-10 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
[Roland said not to talk to this guy. And for very good reason, he knows that, but Daan would feel better keeping some kind of tabs on Argalia.]

I put down a 1. Didn't like the fact that I bled a lot. Not a fan, personally.

[that and the trauma but you know]
limbical: (cause everybody digs)

[personal profile] limbical 2023-11-10 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
I don't really like ruining my clothes.

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-10 04:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-10 04:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-10 04:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-10 04:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-10 05:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-10 05:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-12 17:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-12 20:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-12 21:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-12 21:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-13 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-13 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-13 01:29 (UTC) - Expand

1/2

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-13 01:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-13 01:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-13 02:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] limbical - 2023-11-13 02:45 (UTC) - Expand
coolerjunpei: (003)

audio, un: junpei

[personal profile] coolerjunpei 2023-11-10 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
[huh a totally normal guy on the network]

I didn't go, so I just ignored it. But a few months ago, they asked us if we liked working together as a group better than going it alone... That was when they locked us in the mall.

Soooo if they're trying to improve, it sounds like it's not going great...?
coolerjunpei: (jam jamilton)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei 2023-11-10 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
Counterparty...? [He knows. He saw the fliers. But that's a Silly Name, even for Junpei.] I didn't go to that one, either. Nothing happened to me for just sitting around in my apartment.

[But only because he didn't do it with spiteful intentions, not that he knows this... It was the cup noodle depression era, nothing more.]

Working together against the mastermind, though? Maybe the next try should be more covert. Uh, I mean, if anyone was going to... break the rules again.

(no subject)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei - 2023-11-10 04:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei - 2023-11-10 05:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei - 2023-11-10 05:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei - 2023-11-10 05:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei - 2023-11-10 05:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei - 2023-11-12 18:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei - 2023-11-12 19:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] coolerjunpei - 2023-11-13 03:29 (UTC) - Expand
kampfgeist: (skeptical | on god?)

text | @stray

[personal profile] kampfgeist 2023-11-10 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
i gave it a 1 and said i'd run from the voice

[ this place's csat probably blows ]
kampfgeist: (annoyed | bout to sin again)

[personal profile] kampfgeist 2023-11-13 05:43 am (UTC)(link)
in this place, hearing a voice in a dark seems unlikely to be a good sign

(no subject)

[personal profile] kampfgeist - 2023-11-20 06:46 (UTC) - Expand
wreatharrow: (ꕥ 86)

voice; un: avidya

[personal profile] wreatharrow 2023-11-10 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I said I would turn towards the voice. It's an unfair question in my opinion.
wreatharrow: (ꕥ 71)

[personal profile] wreatharrow 2023-11-12 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I likely would have followed it, yes. Part of my job is responding to those in need of assistance.

(no subject)

[personal profile] wreatharrow - 2023-11-12 22:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] wreatharrow - 2023-11-16 04:21 (UTC) - Expand
luminously: (3163430 (20))

audio; Silent Princess

[personal profile] luminously 2023-11-11 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
Admittedly, I myself am torn. It would be best for them to know about our dissatisfaction, however... Would it be more wise to ignore the survey entirely? It almost feels as though our captors will only be motivated to organize even more ways to catch those here off guard.
luminously: (3163430 (15))

[personal profile] luminously 2023-11-13 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
( Not at all actually. )

The only effort that does not matter is one not attempted at all.
unimportant: (serving tea)

un: yukixoxo, audio

[personal profile] unimportant 2023-11-11 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
I think they're just making fun of us. Trying to gauge our emotional reaction to the ordeal.

[ She gave a 1 though so not like she's part of the solution! ]
unimportant: (41)

[personal profile] unimportant 2023-11-15 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
If I look at it generously, it helps them plan the next ordeal. Figure out what got under our skin, what the results were on their end, and then take that data to apply for whatever is next.

The ungenerous assessment: it's mockery. People are cruel for cruelty's sake sometimes.